wanepia
Sign in Start free
comparison

Wanepia vs Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma monitors URLs. Wanepia monitors your services — with a catalog, structured entities, push checks, and a full REST API your team and agents can drive.

Uptime Kuma

A self-hosted uptime monitoring tool with a clean UI. Great for personal projects and simple URL health checks. No API, no service catalog, single-user focus.

self-hosted URL monitoring no API single user

Wanepia

API-first service catalog with built-in uptime monitoring. Designed for engineering teams: structured blueprints, push checks, multi-tenant access, and alerting via Slack, Discord, Telegram, webhook and ntfy.

API-first service catalog push checks multi-tenant
Feature Uptime Kuma Wanepia
HTTP / TCP uptime checks
Push-based checks (agents report in)
REST API
Service catalog with blueprints
Structured entities (services, datastores, jobs)
Dependency graph
Health heatmap
State transition historybasic
Slack alerts
Discord alerts
Telegram alerts
Webhook alerts
ntfy alerts
NATS alerts
Public status pages
Multi-tenant / team access
Prometheus metrics exportbasic
Model Context Protocol (MCP) for AI agents
Free tier (cloud-hosted)✓ (10 services)
Self-hosted option

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

You want a simple, self-hosted tool to ping URLs and get notified when something is down. No teams, no API, no catalog — just you and a list of services to monitor.

Choose Wanepia if…

You run more than a handful of services, have a team, or need your monitoring to be programmable. Wanepia gives you a queryable catalog your CI/CD, agents, and on-call runbooks can talk to.

Bottom line

Uptime Kuma is a great tool for simple URL monitoring. If that's all you need, it's hard to beat. But once you start managing multiple services across teams — or want your infrastructure catalog to be the source of truth for on-call, agents, and deployment pipelines — you need something built for that from the start.

Wanepia is the API-first layer that Uptime Kuma was never designed to be.